Life Satisfaction Scale By Alam And Srivastava
Life Satisfaction Scale By Alam And Srivastava === https://urlgoal.com/2t4hvz
Background: Quality of life plays a vital role to improve the life satisfaction of an individual. The increase in quality of life is related to the increase of subjective life satisfaction. There is an existing relationship between quality of life and life satisfaction for persons with alcohol dependence (Frisch et al., 2000). Aim: The aims of the present study was to assess and examine the relationship between Quality of life and life satisfaction among persons with alcohol dependence. Methodology: A total number 30 respondents with alcohol dependence syndrome were taken by using a purposive sampling technique. The samples were collected from MHI (COE), SCBMCH, Cuttack IPD and OPD. The scales such as WHOQOL-BREF questionnaire and Life Satisfaction were administered. Result: In this present study it was found that the persons with alcohol dependence scored the poor quality of life in all domains of WHO QOL, as well as life satisfaction scale and also statistically positive significant co-relation between quality of life and life satisfaction among persons with alcohol dependence.
Clifford, P. R., Edmundson, E. W., Koch, W. R., & Dodd, B. G. (1991). Drug use and life satisfaction among college students. International Journal of the Addictions, 26(1), 45-53. Cloninger, C. R., Sigvardsson, S., & Bohman, M. (1996). Type I and type II alcoholism: An update. Alcohol Health & Research World, 20(1), 18-23.
Work stress has been implicated as an important health hazard for military personnel. In a study of 472 personnel who had not been exposed to any war , 26% reported to be suffering from significant work stress. Nearly one in five blamed work stress for causing significant emotional distress and one in ten reported work stress was severe enough to affect their emotional health. This was independent of the age, sex, education, years of military service and marital status. The job stressors reported by these personnel were not specific to military service but common to civilians, such as change in work responsibilities, work hours or type of work. We found higher stress in junior sailors and certain branches such as the domestic, provost and technical as compared to the executive branch. High levels of occupational stress have also been reported in the lower ranks in armed forces of United Kingdom . In a three year study by the Royal Navy, the two main causes of stress were balancing work versus home life and discord in working relationships and that good supervisor support was very effective in managing stress . 75.7% of the junior sailors were unsatisfied with their lives compared to 42.8% of the senior sailors and 31.8% of the officers. The findings were statistically significant. Persons with poor life satisfaction also reported higher occupational stress (Table 6). Thus occupational stress leads to lower life satisfaction.
This study was conducted to examine the gender difference in life satisfaction and consisting areas of those living old-age-homes. 150 men and 150 women living in various old-age-homes situated in Meerut city were recruited for this study. Participants were examined life satisfaction scale developed and standardized by Alam & Dr. Ramji Srivastava. By calculating the mean values and t-test value, the difference between male and female significance was estimated with regard to life satisfaction. Results of this study showed that men have significantly greater life satisfaction than women. Health satisfaction, personal satisfaction and social satisfaction are the consisting aspects of life satisfaction, on which men reported greater level, whereas economic, job and marital satisfaction are the aspects of life satisfaction, on which men and women report no significant difference.
Mental health inventory by jagdish and srivastava manual And jagdishand life. this scale consists 60 items ( adopted version) based on 6 dimensions : ( 1) positive self- evaluation, ( 2) realistic perception ( 3) integration of personality ( 4) autonomy ( 5) group- oriented attitude ( 6) environment mastery. results show that 1) there is no significant difference between urban and rural. they were assessed by using occupational stress questionnaire ( osq, gmelch and chan, 1994), brief cope scale ( carver, 1997), social support scale ( cohen et al. 456 has been found between. mental health diagnosis must be the primary diagnosis. colleges of education of four districts of himachal pradesh. mental health questionnaire ( mhq) developed by srivastava and bhattwas used for the assessment of the extent of mental ill- health of employees. the statistically analyzed result corroborates that subjects of high income family possess good mental health as compared to the low income participants.
1985), and mental health inventory ( jagdish and srivastava, 1983). alam & srivastava' s life satisfaction scaleand jagdish and srivastava' s mental health inventorywere used to measure the variables under study. drawn randomly from the population. krashaff, askensey and dohrenwend ( 1978). the mean age of the sample was 40 years and average experience of 15 years of police service.
srivastavawas used for data collection. mental health inventory by jagdish and srivastava ( 1996)? a study related to mental health of teachers with reference to level of teaching and teaching experience. perceived sources of work stress and satisfaction among hospital and community mental health staff, and their relation to mental health, burnout and job satisfaction. com vol- iii, issue- vii, july- page 87 mental health is, thus a dynamic functioning of the whole organism.
this measure was used to study in various aspects. srivastava and scale of emotional competency ( sec) developed by h. 2 mental health inventory ( mhi) ( jagdish & srivastav, a) purpose mental health inventory ( mhi) developed by jagdish and srivastavwas utilized to access positive aspects of mental health. the mental health inventory ( jagdish and srivastava, 1983) has been used to quantify the study and their socioeconomic status was measured with the help of family income. this instrument helps in the measure of overall emotional functioning.
the reliability of the inventory was determined by split half method using odd even procedure. the data was obtained using emotional maturity scale by bhargava m and mental health inventory ( mhi) by jagdish and srivastava. further, emotional maturity scale developed by singh and bhargavawas administered to measure the emotional maturity of women. mental health inventory: in the present study, mental health inventory ( mhi) mhi developed by jagdish & srivastavawas employed in the assessment of mental health. studies related to self- confidence conducted in india basavannastudied self- confidence as an attribute of self- concept. subject( s) : employee' s mental health - - psychological instrument ddc classification: 658. eight youth selected for this study. krashaff, askensey and dohrenwend ( 1978).
The cognitive component has been more closely conceptualized with life satisfaction (Andrews & Withey, 1976), yet despite this, had not previously received much attention for research. Diener et al. (1985) sought to address this and through developing the SWLS, they created a strong tool in the measurement of the cognitive components they felt reflected a subjective sense of wellbeing and life satisfaction.
The SWLS is not designed to help you understand satisfaction in any one specific domain of life, such as your job or relationships; instead, it has been developed to help you get a sense of your satisfaction with your life as a whole.
The scoring for the SWLS works quite simply, by adding up the total of the numbers you score against each of the statements. So, remembering that 1 = strongly disagree and 7 = strongly agree, the higher your score, the higher your sense of life satisfaction as a whole.
Rather than there being one or two things that you feel would give you greater satisfaction, you might feel that small improvements across all domains of your life would lead to a higher sense of life satisfaction.
As you may have guessed, a score at the very low end of the scale means that you are extremely dissatisfied with your current life circumstances. Again, if this score is due to a recent hard blow in life, such as bereavement, then things may get better over time with the right support.
The SWLS is one of the most widely used measurements for life satisfaction. The shortness and ease of being able to administer the scale to achieve foundation results is key to this, but how reliable does that actually make it?
Further research has confirmed this reliability against other measures of life satisfaction (Pavot et al., 1991, Pavot & Diener, 2008) as well as other measures for happiness (Lyubomirsky & Lepper, 1999). It has also correlated well with scales measuring the meaning of life (Steger et al., 2006) and scales measuring hope (Bailey & Synder, 2007).
The only part of the scale that has been questioned in the research is the use of the fifth statement, as researchers believe it has a weaker association with life satisfaction and instead causes participants to reflect on the desire to change rather than their current sense of life satisfaction (Pavot & Diener, 1993).
As well as happiness and life satisfaction, Diener studied the factors that influence these two areas, including financial health, family upbringing, personality, relationships, and work. He studied these topics across 166 different nations and explored some of the cultural components behind individual happiness.
While the SWLS can offer you an indication of your life satisfaction on a more overall scale, there are other tools and resources that can help you to further explore your sense of satisfaction in specific domain areas of your life.
Once you have your scores for each of the 10 domains, you can reflect on where you have given the lowest scores, why these are low scores, and what you might be able to do to start making positive changes and improve your sense of life satisfaction. 2b1af7f3a8